Skip to content
AI Perception Report

Linear in AI answers, today.

What today’s AI engines say when buyers ask about your category: your AI perception, scored against your direct competitors. Treat it as a diagnosis. The quick wins to start improving it are below.

AI Perception Score

Linear is recommended by AI, ahead of all 5 named rivals.

AI recognises Linear but doesn't land on you for the queries that matter most. Start with the moves below.

Category avg 42±3 pts variance
4/4
engines cover you
10/10
buyer queries hit
+21
pts vs. category avg
57/100
AI readiness
Engine consensus58Medium confidence

Engines diverged most on 'product development system with cycle tracking and analytics for SaaS teams': perplexity ranked the brand recommended; gemini absent.

5 quick wins below could lift this score by up to +14 pts
Score breakdown

What’s behind your 63/100

Four sub-scores feed your AI perception total. The weakest one is usually the cheapest place to lift the headline.

AI visibility28 / 35 pts

Brand visible in 24 of 37 cells (6 leading, 12 recommended, 6 mentioned). 15 first-position mentions earn the +25% bonus.

Competitive position13 / 20 pts

Across 37 evaluated cells, competitors lead on average; avg diff vs strongest competitor = -14 pts.

Positioning clarity13 / 25 pts

10 of 10 queries had enough visibility to score (skipped 0 where the brand was effectively absent). Higher = engines describe the brand consistently when they describe it.

Source coverage8 / 20 pts

30 of 152 distinct sources cited the brand (19.7% share).

Competitor score race

You vs. the field

  1. 1.Linear(you)63
  2. 2.Jira62
  3. 3.Shortcut45
  4. 4.Asana36
  5. 5.Plane33
  6. 6.Height13

You lead every named rival. 1 pts ahead of Jira and 21 pts above the category average.

Engine coverage

Where AI talks about you

Perplexity
Cited23 cited pages
Gemini
Mentioned8 cited pages
ChatGPT
Cited10 cited pages
Google AI Overviews
Mentioned34 cited pages
Query × engine matrix

Where the score comes from

Perplexity
Gemini
ChatGPT
Google AI Overviews
±13
±13
±13
±13
±25
±13
±25
±13
±38
±25
±13
±13
±13
±13
±38
±25
±13
±13
±13
±25
±13
AbsentWeakMentionedCited oftenRecommendedLeadingSuggested
Sentiment by Query

How AI answers frame you and the field, query by query

Each cell is the sentiment the AI engines express about a brand when they answer that query — read from their own answer text and combined across engines, so a cell reads “mixed” when the engines disagree.

Sentiment analysis was not available.

Positioning quadrant

Visibility vs. clarity

Where AI places you against your category: described, defined, neither, or both. Clarity moves are usually cheaper than visibility moves. They pull you up before they pull you right.

Clear but hidden
Visible leader
Invisible & unclear
Noisy but vague
Clarity ↑
Visibility →
Linear
Jira
Shortcut
Asana
Plane
Height
Where you sit

Linear sits at 89 visibility and 67 clarity, placing it in the Visible leader quadrant. Visibility is strong; the gap is on clarity — engines know Linear exists but don't consistently articulate its specific differentiation. Sharpening how AI engines describe the 'why Linear over Shortcut' case is the highest-leverage move.

The competition

Jira scores 66 visibility and 55 clarity — lower on both axes than Linear. Linear leads the field on this scan. Shortcut is the closest challenger in citation volume across comparison queries, appearing alongside Linear in nearly every alternatives list.

How AI describes you

What AI thinks you do

Category
“Linear is a favorite among fast-moving engineering teams... integrates issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps”
Clear
Target buyer
“best for: product+engineering teams that want a clean, fast Jira replacement and already think in cycles/sprints”
Clear
Core offer
“Linear is explicitly positioned as 'the product development system for teams' and includes cycle tracking, project updates, analytics”
Clear
Differentiation
“keyboard-first interface, streamlined workflows for cycles, and seamless integrations with tools like GitHub and Figma”
Partial
Third-party proof
“fast-growing startups are built on Linear”
Weak
Category leadership
“Linear is the industry gold standard for fast-moving software and AI teams”
Partial
Plain-English read

Linear is accurately described across most engines as a fast, developer-first issue tracker and the default Jira alternative for high-growth software teams. Differentiation is the weakest signal: engines name speed and keyboard-first UX but rarely articulate what Linear does that Shortcut or Plane cannot, and third-party proof beyond vague startup references is thin across all four engines.

Citation Source Mix

Where citations come from

Where AI engines pull citations from when they answer questions in your category — broken down by source type. Cards highlighted as Gap are categories where rivals are cited more often than you; use them to choose where to earn, improve, or protect mentions.

Owned Minor

docs · site · repo

Top domains
  • linear.app
Citations
15/78
Rivals lead

Competitors Moderate

rival docs · pages

Top domains
  • shortcut.com
  • atlassian.com
  • plane.so
Citations
63/78
Rivals lead

Vendor content Significant

docs · blogs · product pages

Top domains
  • monday.com
  • docs.github.com
  • baserow.io
Citations
46/221
Balanced

Social & creators Minor

creators · video

Top domains
  • youtube.com
Citations
15/43
Rivals lead

Community & forums Minor

forums · threads

Top domains
  • github.com
  • reddit.com
  • agileleadershipdayindia.org
Citations
6/23
Rivals lead
Gap

Consultants & agencies Minor

agencies · integrators

Top domains
  • resolution.de
  • scalence.com
  • alexanderjarvis.com
Citations
0/13
Rivals own

Other sources

Press & media · Education · Analyst & authority · Company directories · Other sources

Top domains
  • ventureharbour.com
  • businesswire.com
  • marketermilk.com
Citations
0/17
Rivals own
Linear
Source coverage8/20
Cited by 30 of 152 sources (20%)
Suggested moves
Gap
Community & forums

Community & forums are cited across this scan, and rivals are cited there roughly 2× more often than you.

  • makemeacto.substack.com
  • medium.com
  • age-of-product.com
Third-Party Opportunities

Where to earn or improve mentions

Third-party sources that AI engines already cite in this market, ranked by how useful they are for mention-building, profile work, and source-ready proof. Priority compares citations, query spread, engine spread, and whether competitors are mentioned more than you; it is not proof that a source caused ranking.

  1. youtube.comsocial
    Priority100
    43 citations8 queries2 engines
  2. github.comcommunity
    Priority23
    8 citations4 queries3 engines
  3. baserow.iovendor
    Priority17
    9 citations4 queries2 engines
  4. monday.comvendor
    Priority11
    10 citations4 queries2 engines
  5. notion.comvendor
    Priority10
    7 citations4 queries3 engines
  6. docs.github.comvendor
    Priority6
    8 citations6 queries1 engine
  7. langchain.comvendor
    Priority5
    4 citations2 queries3 engines
  8. learn.microsoft.comvendor
    Priority5
    4 citations3 queries3 engines
  9. mindstudio.aivendor
    Priority4
    6 citations3 queries2 engines
  10. ventureharbour.commedia
    Priority4
    4 citations2 queries2 engines
AI Readiness

AI readiness checklist

5 categories of site signals that decide whether AI can read, render, and trust you.

Crawlability20/ 20ptsCan AI engines reach and index your site?
  • GoodAI citation crawlers allowed (robots.txt)

    4/4 citation crawlers allowed · blocked

    18/18
  • GoodAI training crawlers allowed (robots.txt)

    Total: 3 · Blocked: 0 · Allowed Count: 3

    2/2
Renderability5/ 15ptsDoes your content render fast enough for engines to read?
  • GoodContent server-rendered

    Threshold: full_1500_plus · Char Count: 8650

    5/5
  • Not measuredLargest Contentful Paint ≤ 2.5s

    Couldn't measure right now. Google's PageSpeed API didn't respond — try the scan again in a few minutes.

    0/4
  • Not measuredTotal Blocking Time ≤ 200ms

    Couldn't measure right now. Google's PageSpeed API didn't respond — try the scan again in a few minutes.

    0/3
  • Not measuredCumulative Layout Shift ≤ 0.1

    Couldn't measure right now. Google's PageSpeed API didn't respond — try the scan again in a few minutes.

    0/3
Structured data18/ 41ptsDoes your site give AI the structured data it needs to classify you confidently?
  • MissingJSON-LD structured data present

    Count: 0

    0/6
  • MissingHigh-value JSON-LD types

    No high-value JSON-LD types found

    0/11
  • PoorOrganization entity (sameAs + name)

    Found In: footer_social_links_only · Social Count: 6

    4/8
  • GoodSitemap reachable

    Sitemap reachable · 903 URLs

    6/6
  • GoodCanonical tags

    Canonical: https://linear.app

    4/4
  • PoorTitle + meta description

    Desc Ok: no · Desc Len: 64 · Title Ok: yes

    1/3
  • GoodOpenGraph metadata

    Og Present: {"og:url":false,"og:image":true,"og:titl · Twitter Card: yes

    3/3
Content9/ 11ptsIs there enough recent, substantive content for engines to cite?
  • Needs workContent density on key pages

    1459 words on key pages · structured headings

    4/6
  • GoodContent freshness

    Last updated ~0 days ago

    5/5
Trust5/ 13ptsDo third-party signals back you as a credible source?
  • GoodHTTPS enforced

    Hsts: yes · Https: yes

    3/3
  • Not measuredEarned authority signals

    Couldn't measure right now. Google's PageSpeed API didn't respond — try the scan again in a few minutes.

    0/8
  • Goodllms.txt present
    2/2
Competitor Content Evidence

Competitor pages AI already cites

Competitor-owned URLs that show up in cited answers. Use this as a short map of what proof, comparisons, and topics rivals have made easy for AI systems to reuse.

Shortcut

24 cited uses
  1. Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups, Jira alternatives for software teams that want less process overhead, Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    12 citations
  2. shortcut.comLanding page

    Cited for Jira alternatives for software teams that want less process overhead, Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products, best Jira alternatives for fast-moving engineering teams.

    5 citations
  3. Cited for how do engineering teams manage issues and roadmaps without switching between too many tools.

    3 citations
  4. PricingPricing

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups, best Jira alternatives for fast-moving engineering teams.

    2 citations
  5. Cited for Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    1 citations

Jira

20 cited uses
  1. Product RoadmapsProduct page

    Cited for product planning software that combines roadmaps and code review in one place.

    3 citations
  2. ComparisonComparison

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups, Jira alternatives for software teams that want less process overhead.

    3 citations
  3. Pm And AiProduct page

    Cited for Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    2 citations
  4. Cited for issue tracking tool with built-in AI agent workflows.

    2 citations
  5. Roadmap ToolsContent page

    Cited for how do engineering teams manage issues and roadmaps without switching between too many tools.

    2 citations

Plane

14 cited uses
  1. Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups, Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    6 citations
  2. Open SourceLanding page

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups, Jira alternatives for software teams that want less process overhead, best Jira alternatives for fast-moving engineering teams.

    4 citations
  3. Cited for best Jira alternatives for fast-moving engineering teams.

    1 citations
  4. Open SourceLanding page

    Cited for Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    1 citations
  5. PricingPricing

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups.

    1 citations

Asana

3 cited uses
  1. Es PricingPricing

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups.

    2 citations
  2. Cited for Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    1 citations

Height

2 cited uses
  1. height.appLanding page

    Cited for Jira alternatives for teams building AI-native products.

    1 citations
  2. PricingPricing

    Cited for Jira alternatives for high-growth startups.

    1 citations
Owned Content Strategy

What your site should make easier to cite

What AI already cites, which existing pages to improve, and what to create next — mapped against buyer demand and competitor evidence.

Owned-content analysis was not available.

Top moves

Full action list to lift the score.

The moves with the biggest impact on your AI perception for the least effort to implement. A solid starting point — improving AI perception is a longer game.

  1. Add JSON-LD structured data to key pages
    jsonld_present and jsonld_high_value_types are both at 0pts — a combined 17pt deficit. Adding Organization, SoftwareApplication, and FAQPage schema to the homepage and /features is a single-sprint edit.
    +2 perception+17 readiness
    EffortLow
  2. Complete organization_entity sameAs and logo markup
    organization_entity earned 4/8pts. Adding sameAs links to Wikidata, Crunchbase, and LinkedIn, plus a structured logo field, closes the remaining 4pt deficit and strengthens entity disambiguation across all engines.
    See in Readiness Checklist →
    +1 perception+4 readiness
    EffortLow
  3. Publish a named-customer case study with outcome data
    Proof is the weakest understanding signal. Engines cite Linear for speed but never name a customer with a measurable result. One anchor case study (e.g., cycle time reduction at a named company) would give engines a citable proof point across comparison queries.
    +6 perception
    EffortHigh
  4. Fix title and meta description on homepage and /features
    title_and_description earned 1/3pts. The homepage meta description does not include the category phrase 'product development software' or the target buyer, which limits how engines frame Linear in category queries.
    See in Readiness Checklist →
    +1 perception+2 readiness
    EffortLow
  5. Write a differentiation page: Linear vs Shortcut
    Shortcut appears alongside Linear in every comparison query. A /switch/linear-vs-shortcut page with specific capability comparisons gives engines a citable source to distinguish the two — directly attacking the weak differentiation signal.
    +4 perception
    EffortMedium

Lift estimates are directional, calibrated against past scans in similar categories.

Share

Share the snapshot

Drop one of the cards below into a post, deck, or DM — or share the whole report by sending this page’s link.

Pro report PDF

Generate a branded PDF copy of this Pro report.

Download PDF
Next step

Want a 30-minute read on your AI perception?

On a Visibility Teardown call we walk through what’s causing the gap, the 3–5 moves that close it fastest, and what would still hold the score back at 63.